Saturday, August 18, 2007
Ruby: initialize_with
In April I wrote about assigning instance variables in a constructor. The code I provided with that entry supports initializing your classes positionally or with a hash.
Since then, I've been thinking that a nice alternative might be a constructor that takes one argument without a name, but any additional arguments must be named (via a hash). Yes, I basically stole this concept from Smalltalk.
Below is a solution to making the above code execute as expected.
One other small change that you might notice is that I've made all the arguments required. That's a preference that I might blog about later, but I think it should be easy enough to remove the raises if you want your options arguments to be optional.
For those interested, here's the code with tests.
Since then, I've been thinking that a nice alternative might be a constructor that takes one argument without a name, but any additional arguments must be named (via a hash). Yes, I basically stole this concept from Smalltalk.
initialize_with :employee_id, :first_name, :last_name
attr_reader :employee_id, :first_name, :last_name
end
initialize_with :amount
attr_reader :amount
endBelow is a solution to making the above code execute as expected.
first_arg = args.shift
define_method :initialize do |*arg|
instance_variable_set "@", arg.shift
required_args = args.inject(first_arg.to_s) {|result, attribute| result << ", " }
raise ArgumentError.new("initialize requires ") if args.any? && arg.empty?
args.each do |attribute|
raise ArgumentError.new("initialize requires ") unless arg.first.has_key?(attribute)
instance_variable_set "@", arg.first[attribute]
end
end
end
endOne other small change that you might notice is that I've made all the arguments required. That's a preference that I might blog about later, but I think it should be easy enough to remove the raises if you want your options arguments to be optional.
For those interested, here's the code with tests.
first_arg = args.shift
define_method :initialize do |*arg|
instance_variable_set "@", arg.shift
required_args = args.inject(first_arg.to_s) {|result, attribute| result << ", " }
raise ArgumentError.new("initialize requires ") if args.any? && arg.empty?
args.each do |attribute|
raise ArgumentError.new("initialize requires ") unless arg.first.has_key?(attribute)
instance_variable_set "@", arg.first[attribute]
end
end
end
end
initialize_with :employee_id, :first_name, :last_name
attr_reader :employee_id, :first_name, :last_name
end
initialize_with :amount
attr_reader :amount
end
unit_tests do
test "verify Person requires all options" do
assert_raises ArgumentError do
Person.new(2, :first_name => 'mike')
end
end
test "verify Person requires first arg" do
assert_raises ArgumentError do
Person.new(:first_name => 'mike', :last_name => 'ward')
end
end
test "verify Person employee_id" do
mike = Person.new(2, :first_name => 'mike', :last_name => 'ward')
assert_equal 2, mike.employee_id
end
test "verify Person first_name" do
mike = Person.new(2, :first_name => 'mike', :last_name => 'ward')
assert_equal 'mike', mike.first_name
end
test "verify Person last_name" do
mike = Person.new(2, :first_name => 'mike', :last_name => 'ward')
assert_equal 'ward', mike.last_name
end
test "verify Money amount" do
money = Money.new(10)
assert_equal 10, money.amount
end
endLabels: initialize_with, initializer, ruby
Comments:
<< Home
See my post from June about a similar feature:
Creating a field-initializing 'new' method
I agree it would be a useful feature, but why pass a number to initialize_with? Can't you get the size from the hash args anyway?
Creating a field-initializing 'new' method
I agree it would be a useful feature, but why pass a number to initialize_with? Can't you get the size from the hash args anyway?
Pratik, I guess the reason why Jay didn't move attr_reader to initialize_with is that for the attributes some people may want to use only attr_reader, or only attr_writer, or attr_accessor. initialize_with shouldn't be the one making these decisions for the programmers and forcing attr_reader.
Post a Comment
<< Home



