Tuesday, May 01, 2007
Ruby: Validatable Tests
In the comments for my most recent entry, Validatable 1.2.2 released, Jon Leighton asks: how do you recommend testing validations?
I've had this discussion before when I wrote about testing ActiveRecord validations. I've not been able to come up with a 'best practice', but I've had some fun trying out different solutions.
My latest attempt at a solution alternative is to create assertions for the framework. For example, if I were to create a Validatable framework, that framework would include ValidatableAssertions.
To create validations for the Validatable framework I wrote my ideal syntax and then figured out how to make it work. The following code was the original version for validating that a class contained a presence of validation.
Clearly this solution has limitations. Any
If you hate this idea, no worries, you can always test your classes the traditional way: creating an instance and calling the valid? method. This DSL is another tool that may or may not help you out based on the context in which you use it.
The ValidatableAssertions are available in gem version 1.3.0 and greater.
I've had this discussion before when I wrote about testing ActiveRecord validations. I've not been able to come up with a 'best practice', but I've had some fun trying out different solutions.
My latest attempt at a solution alternative is to create assertions for the framework. For example, if I were to create a Validatable framework, that framework would include ValidatableAssertions.
To create validations for the Validatable framework I wrote my ideal syntax and then figured out how to make it work. The following code was the original version for validating that a class contained a presence of validation.
class FooTest < Test::Unit::TestCaseI originally chose the above syntax because it was expressive enough to convey my intent in the code. I spent a bit of time making this syntax work, but in the end I went with a syntax that I found a bit drier, and easier to implement.
Foo.must_validate.presence_of :name
end
class FooTest < Test::Unit::TestCaseThe above code creates a test for each line in the block given to
include ValidatableAssertions
Foo.must_validate do
presence_of :name
format_of(:name).with(/^[A-Z]/)
numericality_of(:age).only_integer(true)
end
end
must_validate. If the Foo class does not contain a presence of validation for name, an error with the text "Foo does not contain a Validatable::ValidatesPresenceOf for name" will be raised.Clearly this solution has limitations. Any
validates_true_for validation cannot be tested using this DSL style of testing. Furthermore, any validation that uses an :if argument cannot use this DSL, since those validations require an instance to eval the :if argument against. However, for validations that are not validates_true_for and do not rely on an :if argument, the ValidatableAssertions can replace various existing success and failure validation tests.If you hate this idea, no worries, you can always test your classes the traditional way: creating an instance and calling the valid? method. This DSL is another tool that may or may not help you out based on the context in which you use it.
The ValidatableAssertions are available in gem version 1.3.0 and greater.
Labels: DSL, RailsConf2007, ruby, validatable
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Ruby: Validatable
I finished up the 1.1.0 release this morning of Validatable. Validatable is a module that you can mix into your classes to add validations.
Validation of an entire hierarchy of objects with errors aggregated at the root object.
class PersonValidatable currently supports
include Validatable
attr_accessor :name
validates_presence_of :name
end
person = Person.new
person.valid? #=> false
person.errors.on(:name) #=> "can't be empty"
- validates_presence_of
- validates_length_of
- validates_format_of
- validates_confirmation_of
- validates_acceptance_of
Validation of an entire hierarchy of objects with errors aggregated at the root object.
class PersonValidations that turn off after X times of failed attempts.
include Validatable
validates_presence_of :name
attr_accessor :name
end
class PersonPresenter
include Validatable
include_validations_for :person
attr_accessor :person
def initialize(person)
@person = person
end
end
presenter = PersonPresenter.new(Person.new)
presenter.valid? #=> false
presenter.errors.on(:name) #=> "can't be blank"
class PersonValidations can be given levels. If a validation fails on a level the validations for subsequent levels will not be executed.
include Validatable
validates_presence_of :name, :times => 1
attr_accessor :name
end
person = Person.new
person.valid? #=> false
person.valid? #=> true
class PersonSimilar to Rails, Validatable also supports conditional validation.
include Validatable
validates_presence_of :name, :level => 1, :message => "name message"
validates_presence_of :address, :level => 2
attr_accessor :name, :address
end
person = Person.new
person.valid? #=> false
person.errors.on(:name) #=> "name message"
person.errors.on(:address) #=> nil
class Person
include Validatable
attr_accessor :name
validates_format_of :name, :with => /.+/, :if => Proc.new { !name.nil? }
end
Person.new.valid? #=> true
Labels: rails, ruby, validatable, validations
Saturday, January 20, 2007
Adding Validations to any Class
On my current project we have data that needs to be collected and then sent to a service. This data needs to be validated, but since it is never put into a model it cannot be validated by using ActiveRecord's validations. To handle this scenario we designed something similar to the module below that can add validations to any class that includes it, which are generally Presenters on my project.
module ValidatableAs you can see I only included the code to expose the validates_presence_of and validates_format_of validations. We actually have quite a bit more, but I think those two are all that's necessary to follow the example. I like the way we designed the validation classes because they can easily be tested and are all treated the same way when it comes time to verify if they are valid or not (the validate method). The code below shows all that is necessary for both the ValidatesPresenceOf and ValidatesFormatOf classes.
module ClassMethods
def validates_format_of(*args)
validate_all(args) do |attribute, options|
self.validations << ValidatesFormatOf.new(attribute, options[:with], options[:message] || "is invalid")
end
end
def validates_presence_of(*args)
validate_all(args) do |attribute, options|
self.validations << ValidatesPresenceOf.new(attribute, options[:message] || "can't be empty")
end
end
def validate_all(args, &block)
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : {}
args.each do |attribute|
yield attribute, options
end
end
protected :validate_all
def validations
@validations ||= []
end
def validate(instance)
self.validations.each do |validation|
instance.errors.add(validation.attribute, validation.message) unless validation.valid?(instance)
end
instance.errors.empty?
end
end
def self.included(klass)
klass.extend Validatable::ClassMethods
end
def valid?
errors.clear
self.class.validate(self)
end
def errors
@errors ||= Validatable::Errors.new
end
end
module ValidatableThe only other piece to the puzzle is the errors collection. The code for this is also very straightforward.
class ValidationBase
attr_accessor :message
def initialize(message)
self.message = message
end
end
class ValidatesPresenceOf < ValidationBase
attr_accessor :attribute
def initialize(attribute, message)
self.attribute = attribute
super message
end
def valid?(instance)
(!instance.send(self.attribute).nil? && instance.send(self.attribute).strip.length != 0)
end
end
class ValidatesFormatOf < ValidationBase
attr_accessor :attribute, :regex, :message
def initialize(attribute, regex, message)
self.attribute = attribute
self.regex = regex
super message
end
def valid?(instance)
instance.send(self.attribute) =~ self.regex
end
end
end
module ValidatableAnother important thing to note is that these validations integrate directly with the ActionView::Helpers::ActiveRecordHelper.error_message_on method. This means the same code in the view that displays ActiveRecord errors can also display errors from any object that includes Validatable.
class Errors
extend Forwardable
def_delegators :@errors, :empty?, :clear
def on(attribute)
@errors[attribute.to_sym]
end
def add(attribute, message)
@errors[attribute.to_sym] = message
end
def initialize
@errors = {}
end
end
end
<%= error_message_on :presenter, :name %>And, here's a few tests if you want to ensure that it works as expected.
class ValidatableTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
test "given no presence when object is validated then valid returns false" do
klass = Class.new
klass.class_eval do
include Validatable
attr_accessor :name
validates_presence_of :name
end
assert_equal false, klass.new.valid?
end
test "given no presence when object is validated then it contains errors" do
klass = Class.new
klass.class_eval do
include Validatable
attr_accessor :name
validates_presence_of :name
end
instance = klass.new
instance.valid?
assert_equal "can't be empty", instance.errors.on(:name)
end
test "given invalid format when object is validated then valid returns false" do
klass = Class.new
klass.class_eval do
include Validatable
attr_accessor :name
validates_format_of :name, :with=>/.+/
end
assert_equal false, klass.new.valid?
end
test "given invalid format when object is validated then it contain errors" do
klass = Class.new
klass.class_eval do
include Validatable
attr_accessor :name
validates_format_of :name, :with=>/.+/
end
instance = klass.new
instance.valid?
assert_equal "is invalid", instance.errors.on(:name)
end
test "given valid data after it is previously invalid when object is validated then it is valid" do
klass = Class.new
klass.class_eval do
include Validatable
attr_accessor :name
validates_format_of :name, :with=>/.+/
end
instance = klass.new
assert_equal false, instance.valid?
instance.name = "Jay"
assert_equal true, instance.valid?
end
end
Labels: presenter, rails, ruby, validatable


